Git & GitHub for Developers
This is not a course about committing code. It's a course about everything that happens after — reviewing, integrating, automating, securing and recovering. The part that decides whether a team of ten ships weekly or breaks nightly. Five weeks, no padding, built for fresh IT graduates and working developers alike.
Git basics are taught free by GitHub itself and by a thousand tutorials — and none of them make you employable, because anyone can commit. The professional skill is everything that happens after. Three things carry this course, and all three are absent from free tutorials. First, the headline: version control in the age of AI-authored code. When coding agents open pull requests directly — turning issues into PRs, iterating in the background, reviewing each other's output — the bottleneck moves from writing code to reviewing and integrating it. Branch protection, required reviews, status checks and repository governance stop being bureaucracy and become the primary control surface over what reaches production. AI-generated code carries the same risks as human code — vulnerable patterns, committed secrets, risky dependencies — only faster. We teach reviewing machine-generated changes at volume, keeping diffs reviewable, designing protection rules that hold when volume rises, and the provenance of who — or what — authored a change.
Second, recovery and history surgery — the confidence angle. The reason developers fear Git is that they don't know how to undo things. Recovering apparently lost commits, undoing a bad merge or rebase, resolving genuinely hard conflicts, bisecting to the commit that broke something, rewriting history safely versus dangerously. Nobody is senior until they can fix a repository at 11pm without panicking — and that is a teachable skill. Third, GitHub as a delivery and security platform, not a file host: automation pipelines, environments and deployment gates, governance rulesets, secret and code scanning, dependency vulnerability management, and supply-chain hygiene. That is platform-engineering territory, and it is where the professional value sits.
A structural note, made confidently: this course is shorter than its siblings on purpose. Five focused weeks that deliver real capability beat ten padded ones — you are learning a discipline, not a framework. And it multiplies everything else: every other course in this catalogue assumes you can collaborate on a shared codebase; this is the one that makes that true. Whether you are a fresh IT graduate whose public contribution history is your most verifiable credential, or a working developer who has used three Git commands for years — an enormous group, and the quiet embarrassment is exactly why it never gets fixed — this is the shortest path from "it works on my branch" to running the repository.
The Course That Multiplies the Others
- Every project in React.js, Node.js, FastAPI, Django, .NET and Golang lives in a repository, ships through CI, and gets reviewed before it merges. This course is that layer.
- Not a competitor to anything in the section — the companion to all of it. Take it first, alongside, or as the upgrade your workflow has been waiting years for.
Course at a Glance
- Duration: 5 weeks | ~35 hours | live + hands-on — deliberately shorter than its siblings
- Format: Live online · scenario-driven labs on realistic repositories
- Prerequisite: You write code in some language; basic command line comfort. No prior Git experience required — but we go well beyond the basics quickly.
- Curriculum: 7 modules, from the object model to security, scale and capstone
- Portfolio: 8 scenario labs plus a governed-repository capstone — and a real open source contribution
- Curriculum reviewed: July 2026 — the platform ships continuously; this syllabus tracks current capabilities
Course Highlights
- Every module leads with what you build, ship or recover from — not what you "learn about"
- Git taught as a mental model of the graph — every confusing situation becomes obvious
- Recovery as a core competency: reflog, bisect, history surgery, hard conflicts
- Reviewing AI-generated changes at volume — what to check first, what humans must still own
- Governance as a control surface: protection rules, required checks, code ownership, merge queues
- CI/CD automation with environments, approval gates and release automation
- Security as practice: secret-leak incident response, dependency and code scanning, supply-chain hygiene
- A real open source contribution, start to finish — a credential anyone can verify
Hands-on Projects & Portfolio
A deliberately broken repository — lost commits, a bad rebase, a poisoned history — restored without losing work.
Find the exact commit that introduced a regression in a long history.
The same feature through trunk-based and branch-based flows — compare what each cost.
A realistic pull request — including a machine-generated one — with written review feedback assessed.
Protection rules, required checks, code ownership and a merge queue on a multi-contributor repository.
Matrix builds, caching, environment gates and automated releases.
Detect, rotate, purge from history, and prevent recurrence.
A real pull request to a real project, start to finish.
Take an unmanaged repository to fully governed, automated and secured — and defend the choices.
Tools & Stack
Git GitHub GitHub Actions GitHub CLI pull requests & code review repository rulesets CODEOWNERS merge queues Dependabot secret scanning code scanning GitHub Projects pre-commit hooks semantic versioning conventional commits Docker VS Code
Career Outcomes
An honest framing: this is rarely a job title on its own. It is the skill that makes every other engineering role work — and it is disproportionately visible, because your commit history, pull requests and review comments are the most public artefacts of how you work. As more code is generated rather than typed, review, integration and governance become the scarce skills — exactly what free Git tutorials don't teach. And a well-maintained public contribution history is one of the few credentials a hiring manager can verify directly. Where it pays:
- Software Engineer at any level
- Senior Engineer and Tech Lead — review and governance are core to the role
- DevOps and Platform Engineer
- Release Engineer
- Engineering Manager
- Open source contributor building a visible public track record
Who This Course Is For
- Final-year students and fresh IT graduates who know commit and push — and freeze at anything else
- Developers with years of experience who have never learned Git beyond three commands — you are in very large company, nobody here will make you feel bad about it, and five weeks from now the problem is gone
- Engineers moving into senior, lead or review-heavy roles
- Teams adopting AI coding tools who now face far more pull requests than before
- DevOps and platform engineers owning CI/CD and repository governance
- Anyone who wants to contribute to open source but doesn't know how to start
Material Includes
- Class recordings
- Broken-repository labs & recovery runbooks
- Review checklists & governance templates
- Certificate
Prerequisites
- You write code in some language
- Basic command line comfort
- No prior Git experience required — we go beyond the basics quickly
Estimated Time: 5 Hours
You build:- A hand-drawn (then tool-verified) map of a real repository's graph — objects, refs, HEAD — that turns every confusing Git situation you've ever hit into something you can picture
- The object model (blobs, trees, commits); refs and branches as pointers; the staging area
- HEAD and detached HEAD; what a merge and a rebase really do to the graph
- Remotes and tracking — a mental model, not a command list
Estimated Time: 5 Hours
You ship:- A working history that reads as documentation — conventional commits, semantic tags, clean ignore rules — plus the removal of a file that should never have been committed
- Meaningful commits and history as documentation; conventional commit messages; interactive staging; stashing
- Tags and semantic versioning; configuration and aliases; ignore rules and cleaning up wrongly committed files
- Large file handling; working across multiple checkouts
Estimated Time: 5 Hours
You ship:- The branching-model exercise: the same feature run through trunk-based and branch-based flows, with a written comparison of what each cost — and a model recommendation for a given team
- Trunk-based development versus long-lived branches versus release branching; feature flags as an alternative to branch isolation
- Merge versus rebase as a team decision rather than a preference; keeping a readable history
- Forks and contribution workflows; choosing a model for team size and release cadence
Estimated Time: 5 Hours
You recover:- The disaster lab: a deliberately broken repository — lost commits, a bad rebase, a poisoned history — restored without losing work, plus a bisect investigation pinning the commit that broke a build
- The reflog and recovering "lost" work; undoing commits, merges and rebases safely; interactive rebase for cleaning history; cherry-picking
- Resolving hard conflicts including binary and structural ones; bisecting to the commit that introduced a bug
- Rewriting history safely — and the rules for when you must not; repairing a repository someone else broke
Estimated Time: 5 Hours
You ship:- The governance build-out — protection rules, required checks, code ownership, a merge queue — plus the review workshop on a realistic PR, including a machine-generated one, with your written feedback assessed
- Pull request practice that catches real problems; reviewing for design rather than style; feedback without friction; keeping changes small and reviewable
- Branch protection and repository rulesets; required checks and approvals; code ownership; merge queues
- Reviewing AI-generated changes at volume — what to check first, what humans must still own, and keeping review meaningful when PR volume rises
Estimated Time: 5 Hours
You ship:- A CI/CD pipeline with matrix builds, caching, environment gates and automated releases — then debug a deliberately failing pipeline to done
- Continuous integration workflows; matrix builds and caching; reusable and composite workflows
- Secrets and environment management; deployment environments with approval gates; release automation and changelogs; packages and artifacts
- Self-hosted and larger runners; cost control; debugging a failing pipeline; automating routine repository work
Estimated Time: 5 Hours
You ship:- The secret-leak incident response — detect, rotate, purge, prevent — a real open source pull request, and your capstone: one repository taken from unmanaged to fully governed, automated and secured, defended
- Secret scanning and credential-leak response; dependency vulnerability management; code scanning; signed commits and artifact provenance
- Supply-chain risk in third-party actions and dependencies; permissions and least-privilege tokens; organisation-level governance; monorepo strategies
- Open source contribution practice; capstone build and defense
- What's App: +91 73-01-11-21-31 for immediate assistance during business hours.
- Email: Send your inquiries to hello@progmatrix.com, and one of our representatives will get back to you as soon as possible.
- Website: You can also use the contact form on our website to send us a message directly.